top of page

Glossary

The Expert’s Handicap

The fixed-mindset trap that catches senior leaders with AI: the more your identity is tied to knowing your domain, the more your practice quietly avoids the work where it would matter most.

The AI Convergence Discipline

Three sequential moves that pull a leader back from the AI-expanded option space to a single committed page: close the diagnosis, commit a guiding policy, name coherent actions.

The Leader’s Digital Twin

Three components, Corpus, Curriculum, Contract, that turn the proxy a leader is already training accidentally into one that represents them by design.

The AI Engagement Trap

Leaders who reject AI and leaders who claim it as their own are practising the same failure: a provenance judgement made before a merit judgement.

AI Cognitive Sovereignty

Six layers, model, data, training signal, values, override, exit, across which a leader retains accountable ownership of the AI proxy operating in their voice.

The AI Bias Map

Six cognitive biases that bend AI use: three before the leader prompts, three after AI replies.

Leader Identity Under AI

The organising axis of the AI for Leaders series, running from identity-absent (workslop) to identity-total (identic AI), along which every AI-assisted output is already set somewhere.

The Recursive AI Method

Three named recursions, output, process, practice, that turn one AI session into compounding thinking and prevent single-pass plateau.

The AI Friction Principle

AI removes the friction that built leaders’ judgement; the discipline is to put it back, by design, in three named places.

The AI Probe Rule

Three probe questions that intervene between an AI’s contradiction and the leader’s reflex, turning disagreement into information rather than threat or verdict.

The Gaussian Challenge

The discipline of asking whether a different framing of the question would make the obvious answer unnecessary.

The Drucker Collapse

Three foundational management mechanisms have shifted under generative AI, leaving the old reasoning correct and the conclusions wrong.

The 1% Rule for AI

The discipline of getting 1% better at one specific dimension of your AI use each working week, embedded before the next, so capability compounds rather than plateauing.

The Skim Tax

The cumulative cost of skimming AI output instead of working it through; fourteen named costs across four quadrants, paid in quality now and capability later.

The AI Mode Choice

Every AI session opens in one of two operating modes; the one chosen in the first thirty seconds shapes the output more than any prompt that follows.

The AI Investment Loop

Three moves, challenge, check, capture, that turn an AI hour from maintenance into an investment that compounds session by session.

The AI Allocation Matrix

A 2×2 that plots every AI session by cognitive demand and time-allocation choice, and shows that AI’s strategic leverage lives in only one of four named quadrants.

Leader-Level Judgement and AI

Three components, context-aware, accountable, durable, that distinguish the leader’s call from the model’s recommendation when the assistant can argue both sides equally well.

Growth Mindset for AI

A leader’s stance towards AI as a domain where capability is built at the edge of current ability, not protected by the appearance of already knowing.

The Novice Premium

The deliberate willingness to be visibly slower and clumsier with AI inside your own domain of expertise, paid in exchange for capability that does not arrive without that cost.

Reinventing the Organisation for GenAI

Four structural elements to redesign and three to preserve, to close the gap between desk-level AI productivity and firm-level results.

AI Reverse Delegation

Routing a task upward to AI rather than downward to a team member, when handing it down would erode self-determination and the task is mechanical or contextually low-value to the receiver’s role.

The AI Motivation Myth

The senior-leader misread that treats an AI productivity problem as a motivation problem, when more than eighty per cent of the gap in most organisations is structural.

The AI Bottleneck Lens

Three mechanical questions that move a leader from AI dashboards to constraint dashboards, so AI deployment lifts organisational throughput rather than producing only motion.

Cognitive Surrender

The quiet moment-by-moment decision to stop engaging critically with AI’s output, taken when engagement feels expensive and acceptance feels free.

The Candy Machine Trap

Leaders default to using AI for the easiest, lowest-leverage tasks because friction is near-zero and the reward is immediate.

The AI Relationship Spectrum

Five named relationships a leader can take with AI, each fitting different work, each chosen on purpose before the prompt.

The AI Delegation Cycle

AI is a worker. Brief it, choose it, calibrate its autonomy, check in, and own what comes out.

bottom of page